6. Building Backwards
Why execution-first companies hit scaling walls
The companies hit hardest by this aren’t the ones that stumbled. They’re the ones that moved fast enough to outrun their own explanation of what they do.
You build something real. It works. Customers want it. You scale. And somewhere in that momentum, success and clarity separated. Everyone’s still moving fast. Everyone’s still winning. But sales is telling customers one story. Product is building toward another. Marketing sees it differently again.
By the time you notice that everyone’s describing a different company, the structure that should have held them together was never built.
Success Before Structure
This founding success creates genuine momentum. The energy of solving real problems, the validation from customers who see the value, the confidence that comes from proven wins.
It unfolds inside growing companies with often. The product works. Revenue flows. Networks activate. Success builds on success. There is no reason to pause when execution keeps producing results.
Across industries, the sequence looks the same.
In financial services, new products emerge from a clear customer need. A team builds a solution, proves it works, and scales the use case before strategy catches up.
In professional services, a firm delivers a strong project, turns it into a repeatable offer, and builds a business model around client demand.
In technology ventures, the rhythm accelerates. Features are built, users adopt them, systems expand. The product defines the direction long before the strategy does.
Across all, progress begins with something tangible. The product leads, the pattern of success takes hold, and strategy arrives later to explain what has already been created.
The Scaling Moment
Growth doesn’t slow because people stop working. It slows because the same habits that created early momentum start to collide with what comes next.
At this point, the business feels busy but not necessarily aligned. Teams keep saying yes to opportunities. New initiatives stack on top of old ones. What once felt fast and fluid starts to feel scattered.
The networks that once carried the business begin to tire. The personal introductions, loyal customers and trusted advocates that drove early wins have already delivered and supported all they can. Beyond those circles, new audiences need more context. They don’t yet know the story, the value, or why it matters.
Inside the business, the effort to explain begins to increase. Sales conversations take longer. Marketing materials require more rewriting. Product launches attract attention but not understanding.
This is when tactical fixes appear.
Hire a marketing coordinator. Run some campaigns. Refresh the website. Add another feature. Each action makes sense in isolation, yet none address the underlying issue.
What’s missing isn’t activity, it’s alignment.
The brand, the product and the message no longer move together.
When that happens, effort starts to outpace meaning. The business keeps moving, but the direction begins to blur.
This is the point where success begins to ask for structure.
Where what worked informally now needs to be made explicit.
Where the story, the systems and the strategy all need to catch up to the scale already achieved.
The Reverse Engineering Problem
When strategy follows execution, alignment is easily lost.
Brand frameworks are built to describe what already exists rather than to shape what comes next. Messaging is retrofitted around the product instead of guiding it. Strategy becomes a mirror rather than a map.
Identity built this way tends to fragment. Each function interprets success through its own lens. Marketing focuses on content and leads. Product expands features. Sales adapts the pitch. Everyone is still working, but not necessarily in the same direction.
The result is a company that looks active from the outside but feels disjointed inside. The website tells one story, the sales deck another, and customer experience something else again.
These aren’t execution failures. They are structural symptoms. The foundation that should connect purpose, value and growth was never clearly built. The company has outgrown itself.
The Pattern Recognition
The same pattern appears everywhere once you know what to look for.
The consultant who built a practice around personal expertise struggles to make that expertise transferable.
The service business that grew through referrals can’t articulate its value to people outside its network.
The product led company that built rapidly in response to customer feedback finds its roadmap drifting without a clear through line.
Each started with genuine traction. Each reached the point where past success no longer explains the next stage.
This isn’t about a lack of discipline or skill. It’s what happens when a business grows faster than its own articulation. Decisions made for immediate context compound until the structure can no longer hold them.
The gap that appears is not between brand and marketing, but between intention and expression. The company knows what it is, but cannot yet explain it in ways others can use, repeat or build on.
The Alignment Advantage
The contrast becomes clear when you see companies that build the foundation first.
When strategy, story and structure are connected early, every part of the business reinforces the next. Product decisions are guided by positioning. Hiring reflects the brand narrative. Partnerships make sense because the business knows what it stands for.
Alignment is not decoration. It is architecture.
Without it, teams optimise in isolation. Product adds features. Marketing finds angles. Sales adapts language. Each part performs, but the whole begins to fray.
With it, momentum compounds. Shared frameworks turn individual effort into collective direction. Strategy stops being a document and becomes a language that shapes daily decisions.
The advantage isn’t just efficiency. It’s clarity. Everyone understands not just what’s being built, but why and for whom.
The result is a business that grows with consistency rather than complexity.
From Building and Being
Most growing companies reach a point where what they’ve built works, but the way they describe and organise it no longer does. They have capability, but not yet clear definition. They’ve proven value, but haven’t yet learned how to make it legible to those beyond their first networks.
This isn’t a setback. It’s the natural pause before the next stage of growth.
The companies that navigate it well treat this moment as part of scaling, not separate from it. They see that momentum without structure eventually creates drag. They understand that clarity isn’t a cost to speed, it’s what allows it to continue.
When structure leads, scale follows, and growth regains its direction.
Not to define. Just to notice.
This idea plays out differently when mapped onto decentralised systems. For the Web3 take, see how the theme unfolds in the Paragraph edition itsliminal.xyz
Thanks for reading! Subscribe for free to receive new posts and support my work.